Won't it be fun to watch HER lose again?!?
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/07/hillary-2020-all-signs-point-to-sh...
If the Dems are foolish enough to try it, they deserve the results.
Sun, 07/08/2018 - 3:18pm
#1
HER Again 2020
This idiotic idea is /was in a opinion peace in NY tabloid, now being rehashed by others.
Also idiotic to bother with it.
This guy isn't alone. Another take on the same idea.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/07/08/is-hillary-clinton-secretly-pl...
There's no stopping an unhinged, entitled narcissist.
If I were betting, all my money would be on her being carried out by 18 pallbearers before 2020.
I'm not sure I buy the idea the Dems *want* this, but the Clintonistas do. So 2020 may end up a repeat of 2016, with a different progressive in place of Bernie. Can any progressive outdo the Clinton machine, with all its money tentacles and super delegates?
Time will tell...
'They just didn't get it, but they do now!' Trump shares video montage of the dozens of people who said he would never be president and even laughed at his chances of winning
SOURCE
__________________________________________________________________
Go right ahead, Hil.
Whoa, you people are so obsessed. Gotta keep the bogey-man alive, I suppose. Great sources, BTW. LOL.
Every once in a while,painful as it might be ,there is some truth in a post for some.
It would make sense for Hillary to run again.
That way she could inflict as much damage on the United States as she has on the democrat party.
What sources do you stake your views on, expat?
She has been keeping herself out in front of the public, kept all the fundraising apparatus in place, and has not gone quietly. It is suggestive.
The expression "rode hard and put away wet" somehow comes to mind.
Sunday morning John McD. on his show ,noted it was from NY Post opinion column piece !
The 2020 moves continue...
https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/cartoon-eviscerates-hillary-clin...
Yes, the "moves" continue.
The problem is everytime an article such as this is clicked upon enables the thought !
That would be great for any opponents. Get the terrible candidate to run again? I'm amused that they're not shutting her down. LOL.
Any that offer to take care of the problem have been "Arkancided".
Let us get real.
Who in hell do they have ,Bernie?
Elizabeth Warren, Michelle, Oprah ? and Bernie as VP, because Bernie just wants a better retirement package
Toolsmith's pic of the hildebeast enlightens us as to the source of Al Bundy's "just kill me now."
Mike G
Like I said who do hey have ?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/what-is-she-wearing-hillary-cli...
If you are having trouble believing that there are times when a greater being looks over we foolish little beings this should help. That was supposed to be the leader of our country? Call it luck, divine providence, or whatever you like-I'll take it.
Showing up like that in public isn't going to quell any rumors about medical issues.
Her ramble does suggest the dem excuse for losing in 2018 will be Russian hacking again.
I haven't seen any explanation of that hump at the top of her shoulders at one point-a body cast? She certainly has any number of physical problems that are being hidden at about any cost. The problems residing between her ears are very apparent however.
I think that Mueller & company are well into the process of ruining that excuse with the help of Judicial Watch. He's pretty much loading his own diaper with the Russian BS. Indictments that are never prosecuted don't go on the scoreboard-they simply become increasingly obvious smears.
http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/398247-graham-warrant-for-...
As I mentioned, I think Ms Mueller's BS quotient is wearing the carpet thin. The records of he & his barrister BS artistes represents nothing more than a total vacuum of both ethics and competence. Weissmann remains the record holder being the only one to have lost a case 9-0 at the supremes.
I'm waiting to hear how much it cost. Her last designer "sack" cost $7,497!
Amusingly, a fact check dubbed that "mostly false" since the original claim was $12,495, the original list price. She got that in discount.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-armani-jacket/
The "fact check" also labels the claim that her speech was about income inequality as false, because it wasn't *entirely* about income inequality. As if that makes it OK for a social justice warrior to wear a $7k jacket as long as they don't say too much about income inequality.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/07/is_that_a_catheter_bag_unde...
Apparently The American Thinker is voting on a catheter.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/mystery-was-hillary-wearing-life-alert-...
It is now being stated that the hildebeast was wearing a "life alert" device at her appearance at OZY Fest? She is hardly looking like the picture of health, and hasn't for some time.
Dems still considering Clinton... 2nd in this list.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/394388-biden-leads-2020-dem-field-i...
An amazingly geriatric field, too.