It isn't word count it's facts that register.
What a stupid comment. Why would you post such a dumb thing if you were objecting to the people using more than the allotted tweet measure to express themselves? Can a tweety bird figure out that there is no length limit to facts? What do you think I am talking about? Why do you think Trumpy is conducting an anti media-free America campaign? Because media-free America is reporting on the facts about Trumpy as in the very long article from the NewYorker which little VikingStar refuses to read because it is on his president's censored media list. Yes! It is a very very long article but every part of it adds to the factual story. Funny thing about facts- they often take a longer in-depth examination than can be determined in a tweet. Media-Free-America doesn't care about your attention deficit disorder. Get Over It!
Just because our president has attention deficit disorder doesn't mean we all have to limit our thinking capacity to suit his pea brain size.
I'm curious--besides the Network Which is Spawned of the Devil, exactly which media sources are censoring news that is unfavorable to Trump? I was sort of under the impression that virtually the entire media complex thinks the Donald is Satan's idiot son.
And before you decide you know what I think conservationism is, you may want to look at my 13 years of posting here, or even do something uncanny like asking me. Or ask me why, after supporting Cruz, I ultimately voted for Trump--actually, I'll give that one away free: my vote was an anti-Clinton vote, and the only viable opposition choice was Trump. I will say that in the main (except for this daft health care bill) I have been increasingly hopeful about him.
Once again a attempt to give some very good advice
is responded to with an insult. Completed with a description of someones'
alleged mental deficiencies in a thread that possibly indocates a possible level of paranoia.
Ah another case of exploding head syndrome,which is just like,
"chrismas everyday" !
"Why do you think Trumpy is conducting an anti media-free America campaign? Because media-free America is reporting on the facts about Trumpy as in the very long article from the NewYorker which little VikingStar refuses to read because it is on his president's censored media list. "
First of all, as some can attest here, that would be "large Vikingstar", not "little Vikingstar".
Secondly, I stopped reading the New York Times and the New Yorker and stopped watching most newscasts and much of the media long, long before 2016, because of the hopelessly overwhelming bias and because the "media" was owned lock, stock and barrel by the Democrats.
I really learned this lesson when I was actually at some events that, when I read press descriptions about them, were distorted beyond recognition. I also, BTW, don't watch "Faux" news, for the simple reason that I no longer own a television or have cable.
I understand you're unhappy and bitter with the election results. Turning that bitterness on others is only going to marginalize you (more, that is) and make anything worthwhile that you have to say be guaranteed to be ignored.
Andrea Mitchell is an ugly, pinched-faced, biased Liberal turd who has a voice that has curdled milk. Other than that, she is a great lying water carrier.
lol. Andrea Mitchell is such a schmuck.
Rachel Maddow is a stark contrast to the gaslighting methods implemented by the Trump administrations "fake news" portrayal of media-free-America.
Maddow lays out her case by identifying what we know and what we don't know. In this segment Maddow discuses Mike Flynn, including that Mike Flynn was employed as an agent representing the Turkish government during the campaign and transition to present and has only retroactively registered as a foreign agent recently. Rachel Maddow using the clarity that comes from accurately distinguishing what is known from what is unknown and when what is known became known catches Mike Pence in a lie. Masterful Maddow! Thank You!
It has never been truer that if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem, so it is fair to say that all those responding to the media's message like little Russian trolls spreading mindless hate memes at the messenger are supportive of the Trump administrations's war of America's freedom of the press, and all the other attempts to marginalize the public side of the new public-private hegemony installed in the white house.
Those of you who are here to carrying out trolling and anti-free press activities should consider that it may not excuse you from the possibility of being placed on an undesirable persons lists by the regime. You are dis-obeying the regimes orders not to listen to the regime's censored media list just by clicking on this thread.
It's got to be something to do with that salt air.
Up and down the coast, it's the same psychobabble.
As if you don't have an inner core at As Maine Goes trying to enforce your own undesirable person's list.
Case in point !
Never has there been a more trite statement than this.
Usually offered by persons who are the problem to begin with.
They never allow for any solution that they don't like.
Tom's C's awful post in response to Andrea Mitchel reminded me of something I had read many decades ago in The Mass Psychology of Fascism, by Wilhelm Reich. Reich was describing the cruel and sexual language that was used in cartoons at the time to attack the Jews. In today's world of social media the equivalency is the meme. I remember how our social media walls were filled with hideous memes, many of them sexual, targeting Megan Kelly, the morning after Trump stood on the Republican Primary stage and said "I've been nice to you Megan, but I don't have to be" as if issuing a command to his propaganda army. Over night hate memes about Megan proliferated social media. Why> Because Megan asked Trump a perfectly legitimate question which he could not answer.
I decided to see if I could find a quote from what I had read so many years ago online and much to my surprise the entire text of The Mass Psycology of Fascism is online- or so it is said- but it can't be because it is a very long book and there are only nine pages.
None the less, it is interesting to read now because Reich is writing about an historical period which he lived through and describes what was happening in those times. Many believe that America is in danger of going through a similar transition today.
Here is a quote from the online text of The Mass Psychology of Fascism:
Even more important, however, is the identification of the mass individual with the "Fiihrer." The more helpless
the individual was made by his upbringing, the more strongly does he identify himself with the Fiihrer, the more
does the infantile helplessness take the form of the feeling-one-with-the-Fuhrer. This tendency to identification is
the psychological basis of national narcissism, that is, of a self-confidence based on identification with the
"greatness of the nation." The reactionary middle class individual believes he discovers himself in the Fiihrer, in
the authoritarian state. On the basis of this identification, he feels himself the defender of "the nation," even
though, on the basis of this very identification, he despises "the masses" toward whom he has an individualistic
attitude. His economic and sexual misery is drowned out by the exalting idea of "Herrentum" and of the genius of
the Fiihrer; it makes him forget to what extent he has become an insignificant, uncritical follower.
In contrast, the professionally conscious worker identifies himself with his work instead of the Fiihrer, with the
international totality of working individuals and not with the national homeland. He feels himself a leader,
not on the basis of an identification but on the basis of doing vital, socially necessary work.
Trump called our established media "fake news" Hitler used the term "lying press".
Quote below from Politcus USA, which includes a video of Trump campaign supporters using the term “Lügenpresse”
“Lügenpresse” is a Nazified word from 1914 when it was used by German author Reinhold Anton to refer to foreign propaganda.
The German Defense Ministry even used the word in a book title in 1918, “The Lügenpresse of Our Enemies.” That sounds like Trump too but the enemies were foreign then.
The Führer turned it around to include anyone in the German press who disagreed with him – at least until he had made the German press entirely state-controlled – a state of affairs Trump has already shown he desires.
There sure is a lot of vile, ugly criticism of Trump on every concievable type of media for someone running a fascist regime. I wasn't aware that was a feature of a fascist regime.
Well its proven once again, she brought the Nazis into the thread, wasn't it Anon....C who offered
what that meant in another thread ?
She is married to former FED chair Alan Greenspan also, whose easy money policies created the housing bubble and crash besides arguably beginning America's huge national debt with the help of Congress
There sure is a lot of vile, ugly criticism of Trump on every concievable type of media for someone running a fascist regime. I wasn't aware that was a feature of a fascist regime.
Are you say that identifying Trump as a fascists is "ugly criticism of Trump" ?
Trump kept a copy of Hitler's speeches called My New Order by his bedside when he was married to Ivana. He seems to admire Hitler and other totalitarian dictators like Putin, whom he has publicly praised and never said anything in criticism about. Why is it "ugly criticism" to compare a man to one whom he himself admires and has studied?
Or is it "ugly criticism" to repeat things that Trump has said , such as calling out media"fake news" and "the enemy of the people"?
What are you calling "vile ugly criticism"? I didn't call Trump a loser- did I? Trump is known for his own criticism of many others. He accused Obama of wire tapping Trump Towers with out offering any basis for the claim and in the process accused the FBI of illegal acts- this without basis - but it is being looked into and if the facts don't support Trump's accusation. will you then call it "ugly and vile" for America to ask for explanations from Trump?
Are you calling it "ugly and vile criticism" for the New Yorker to write a factual article about the "meddling businessman's" business in Azerbaijan and the ill repute of the business partners with which he is involved ? In your mind is if just fine for Trump to conceivably be paid with money used to launder terrorists activities but it is "vile and ugly" for the media to report about it.? If what Trump is doing is not ugly and vile, then why would the media reporting about it be ugly and vile?
Isn't it the anti-establishment propaganda industry that brought the one into power? Didn't he pick them up as his base the nano second he entered the race with just a little help from Breitbart News. Were they not spreading vile ugly disinformation about all our elected representatives for four years and calling for the downfall of the established government of the United States- and yet now that same group of propaganda distributors advocates for silencing of all criticism of the current administration?
Now you call it "ugly and vile" criticism if anyone reports the facts about the new regime- It is not the criticism that is "ugly and vile" - it is what is being reported about which is "ugly and vile" You need to distinguish between the two- for the sake of your family.
You need professional help.
What a minute: Wilhelm Reich??? The psychoanalyst who "discovered orgone"? Member of the Communist Party of Austria? The guy who was written off by the entire psychoanalytic community because of his insistence that all neurosis was caused by lack of "orgastic potency"? Who was busted by the FDA for building "orgone accumulators" and practicing medicine without a license? The guy who had sexual perversions of a sort that I won't list them here?
This is the man whose writings you're using as "proof" that we're all fascists and dupes?
"Those of you who are here to carrying out trolling and anti-free press activities "...
Would you please explain to me how not watching Rachel Maddow is "carrying out trolling and anti-free press activities"? Has there been a single person on AMG who, to your sure knowlede, has attempted to prevent the New Yorker magazine from publishing anything it wants to? Has any of us lifted a finger to prevent Maddow from saying any inane thing she wants to?
Do you even both to actually read my responses to you? Did you read that I stopped reading the NYT long before 2016, and why?
Do you actually see yourself as being persecuted for daring to proclaim what has been a common refrain on mass media, that Trump is a "fascist"? Do you seriously think that we haven't heard a barrage of how stupid/evil/monomaniacal/racist/anti-Semetic/(insert your favorite anti-Trumpism here) Donald Trump is?
Do you have any idea at all how increasingly daft you sound?
The merging of government and corporate powers-- fascism.
Obamacare--fascism NAFTA--fascism There is a lot of merging going on in America. The MSM--fascism. 6 corporations own 90% of media outlets and disseminate Government Propaganda. Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, Ghadaafi has to go, Assad gassed his own people, Russia invaded Crimea.
Now that Trump beat Hiliary, the Government is in a bit of turmoil, no longer speaking with one voice through the preferred candidate Hiliary. Trump has to go, right Mac.
Whatever, you did not answer my question.
I will tell you more about what I think is vile and ugly: powerful grown men, who make adolescent girls into sex slaves, slap them around, and tell them that they will kill the girls and their families if the girls tell anyone. How would you like it if that was your teenage girl?
I also think that those people who are political supporters of those men, attack one such individual years later when she files a case in civil court with a signed affidavit under threat of perjury testifying to what took place. The political supporters deem their candidate, who has not signed an affidavit under threat of perjury. to be innocent until proven guilty but try the plaintiff in their own kangaroo court of public opinion calling her a liar and every other name in the book so that their treatment of the plaintiff becomes part of the charges filed in the next civil suit after the first one is dropped for a technical reason. Their candidate who brags that he never settles a case, settles the case and effectively buys his way out of justice with his supporters not caring if he is guilty or not.
Since the accused bought his way out of Americans ever seeing the charges proved or not, what is true under the law only applies under the law. In truth, the public having been denied the chance for it to be proven in a court of law if the would be president is innocent or guilty is justified to draw their own conclusions. His supporters just pretend the case never came up but anyone who read the affidavit is apt to draw the same conclusion that I did. No one makes this stuff up. It was gut wrenching to read that affidavit and I believe it is true, not only because it reads like the truth because of reams and reams of corroborating evidence testifying to the character of the man. which includes the dossiers, which is still being corroborated, fact by fact, by the fact of the testimonies of many other women, by the fact of the way he talks about women, by the fact of how he is seen groping his own daughter, and by the fact of his larger largely corrupt character which includes:
Long time partnership with Felix Sater. known for his mob associations-as recently as February Sater and Trumps lawyer Michael Cohen were freelancing an attempt at making a sanction's deal with Russia
The Trump Hotel in Azerbaijan and his partner in that deal,Ziya Mammadov. "According to the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index, Azerbaijan is among the most corrupt nations in the world"..."reports cited a series of cables sent from the U.S. Embassy in Azerbaijan in 2009 and 2010, which were made public by WikiLeaks. In one of the cables, a U.S. diplomat described Ziya Mammadov as “notoriously corrupt even for Azerbaijan.”
Trump chooses to do business in one of the most corrupt places in the world and to partner with one of the most corrupt politicians in one of the most corrupt places in the world. Earlier, he chose the casino business, also known for corruption.
On Dec 2 2017 President Duterte of the Philippines said that Trump praised his drug control methods- mass killings of anyone accused of a drug crime, no trial required. This was published all over the world but the tweeter in chief has never confirmed or denied it- but then there is a Trump Tower going up in Manila which will make millions for Trump's family. Why risk that? Or maybe it was true?
Trump has praised five brutal dictators- Vladimir Putin, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jon Un, Bashar al-Assad, and Qaddafi
This is the guy that the anti-establishment party elected to "clean up the swap", of all those deemed guilty without trial, of generalized corruption by a wide spread propaganda industry, which I suspect has been long seeded with the help of the Russian trolling industry.
No wonder Trump doesn't want his base to read the fact base media.
There has never been a man so deeply corrupt on so many levels granted such power over the greatest country that once was. This country is in grave danger. Its no laughing matter.
If you can't admit that it is the politician whom you are defending who is vile and corrupt, and mentally deranged, then you have a very deep moral and ethical problem.
It appears that several AMGers have shown evidence that Mack you are not the solution but are in fact
have created your own problem.
There is nothing you can say to turn these people away from Trump. They will believe absolutely anything Trump says and act like juveniles holding their hands over their ears singing "lalalalalalalaal" when there is any criticism. Moreover, stories that a person of normal intelligence could easily discern as satire are swallowed whole by these imbeciles. They really are part of the bottom of the barrel of humanity, where the scum resides, and reasoning with them is futile.
Note: to Tom C
Could we dispense with the picture of Andrea ( Bondo Babe) Mitchell,please.
There is nothing we could say that could turn you and the MSM away from a proven psychopath and liar like Hiliary. A person who along with her husband and Chelsea ran a billion dollar charity fraud, that was a pay for play charity fraud that allowed buying favoritism while she was secretary of state.
A charity fraud Clinton Initiative that instantly closed shop after Hiliary lost the election, surprise, nothing to sell there.